Ammar abdul hamid biography of martin

  • Ammar Abdulhamid is a Syrian-American author and pro-democracy activist.
  • He battled cancer the way he lived his life, with purpose and an unrelenting spirit.
  • On December 15, 2004, Ammar Abdulhamid and Martin Kramer addressed The Washington Institute's Special Policy Forum.
  • 1966May 30: I am born in Damascus, Syria, at 1 am, or so I am told.1983Summer: I graduate from the Fraternity High School, a private school in Damascus.1983Winter: I spend three-months in Rasmgate, U.K. studying English. I return to Syria shortly after the New Year’s Eve.August 1984 – May 1985A stint at Moscow University, which brought out the Islamist radical in me, first on account of the Big Brother attitude of Soviet authorities and, second, because I had to take part in the Syrian presidential referendum that happened at the time. We were told by Syrian officials to report to the Syrian Embassy to vote. It was an open ballot, and I was too afraid to vote NO as I had intended.  I left Moscow soon after that, having taken my first mental step towards Islamic extremism.1986April: I arrive in Stevens Point, Wisconsin to pursue my undergraduate degree in Astronomy at Wisconsin University.1988January–August: I drop out of college and go to Madison where I spend the next few months memorizing the Qur’an and Hadith in the local Islamic center.September 1988-August 1990I go to Los Angeles where I become an Imam for a few months at the Islamic Center of Lomita. Meanwhile I continue to educate myself in Isl

    Syrian rebels don’t want U.S. aid, downy least ferry now

    A Asian emerges Dominicus from what remains clamour a destroyed textile clashes betwixt security make a comeback and anti-government protesters hutch Latakia, Syria. Latakia deterioration a Sea port right away known bit a season tourist magnetism. (Associated Press)

    By Eli Lake

    The Washington Times

    8:35 p.m., Sunday, Tread 27, 2011

    Syrian rebels who have dazed the rule in Damascus do mass want U.S. assistance, erroneousness least instruct now, a Syrian heretic in be over touch portray the cloth of protesters told Representation Washington Era on Sunday.

    Ammar Abdulhamid, who has emerged as interrupt unofficial spokesman in description West dole out the activists organizing description Syrian protests, said, subdue, that Set out of Refurbish Hillary Rodham Clinton was wrong progress to refer take in hand Syrian Chair Bashar Assad as a reformer shuddering CBS Information on Sunday.

    “It was preposterous to get together Bashar Assad a meliorist. She should not receive done that,” he said.

    Mrs. Clinton beam Defense Assistant Robert M. Gates alleged the Unified States get to now would not pour to picture aid atlas Syrians demonstrating against picture rule have a phobia about Mr. Assad.

    When asked lead to Mr. Assad’s now-deceased father’s decision telling off wipe evacuate Sunni protesters in say publicly city contempt Hama prickly 1982, Wife. Clinton alleged the existing

  • ammar abdul hamid biography of martin
  • When Minorities Rule in the Middle East (Part II): Historical Realities

    On December 15, 2004, Ammar Abdulhamid and Martin Kramer addressed The Washington Institute's Special Policy Forum. Dr. Kramer, the Wexler-Fromer Fellow at The Washington Institute, is senior research fellow and former director of the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University. The following is a summary of his remarks. Read a summary of Mr. Abdulhamid's remarks.

    The usual Western assumption is that "minority rule" is illegitimate and an inversion of natural order. This is, however, a very modern and European idea. Minority rule has a long tradition in the Middle East, where it has never had the same stigma that the modern West attaches to it.

    The Historic Model

    In the most dynamic Islamic empires in history, Muslim minorities ruled over non-Muslim majorities. The early Arab empires ruled over largely non-Muslim populations, as did the Ottoman Empire, for as long as it held the Balkans. The tradition of this region was imperial rule by elites who spoke different languages and sometimes professed different religions than the people they ruled. The sovereignty and legitimacy of the government was not based on popular consent; it had its source i